Require Import List PeanoNat Lia.
Import ListNotations.
Require Import Undecidability.CounterMachines.CM1.
Require Import Undecidability.CounterMachines.Util.Nat_facts.
Require Import ssreflect ssrbool ssrfun.
Set Default Goal Selector "!".
Lemma haltingP {M : Cm1} {x: Config}:
halting M x <-> (length M <= state x \/ value x = 0).
Proof.
move: x => [p c] /=.
constructor; first last.
{ case; rewrite /halting /=; last by move=> ->.
move: c => [|c]; first done. by move=> /nth_error_None ->. }
have [* | /nth_error_Some] : length M <= p \/ p < length M by lia.
{ by left. }
rewrite /halting /=.
move: c => [|c]; first by (move=> *; right).
case: (nth_error M p); last done.
move=> [q n] _. move Hr: (S c mod (n + 1)) => r.
move: r Hr => [/mod_frac_lt |r _ [?]]; last by lia.
move: (S c) => ? ? []. lia.
Qed.
Lemma halting_monotone {M : Cm1} {x: Config} {n m: nat} : n <= m ->
halting M (Nat.iter n (step M) x) -> halting M (Nat.iter m (step M) x).
Proof.
move=> ? ?. have -> : m = n + (m-n) by lia.
rewrite iter_plus. elim: (m-n); first done.
move=> * /=. by congruence.
Qed.
Lemma step_value_monotone (M : Cm1) (x: Config) :
value x <= value (step M x).
Proof.
move: x => [p [|c]] /=; first by lia.
case: (nth_error M p) => /=; last by lia.
move=> [j n]. move Hr: (S c mod (n + 1)) => [|r] /=; last by lia.
have := mod_frac_lt Hr. move=> /=. by lia.
Qed.
Lemma run_value_monotone (M : Cm1) (x: Config) (n: nat) :
value x <= value (Nat.iter n (step M) x).
Proof.
elim: n=> /=; first by lia.
move=> n IH. have := step_value_monotone M (Nat.iter n (step M) x).
by lia.
Qed.
Lemma value_monotone {M : Cm1} {x: Config} {n m: nat} :
n <= m -> value (Nat.iter n (step M) x) <= value (Nat.iter m (step M) x).
Proof.
move=> ?. have ->: (m = n + (m - n)) by lia.
rewrite iter_plus. by apply: run_value_monotone.
Qed.
Lemma inc_value_mod {M : Cm1} {p: Config} : value p < value (step M p) ->
exists t, nth_error M (state p) = Some t /\ ((value p) mod ((snd t)+1) = 0).
Proof.
rewrite /step. move: p => [i [|c]] /=; first by lia.
case: (nth_error M i) => /=; last by lia.
move=> [j n]. move Hr: (S c mod (n + 1)) => [|r] /=; last by lia.
move=> _. by exists (j, n).
Qed.
Lemma step_progress (M : Cm1) (x: Config) :
state x < length M -> 1 <= value x ->
step M x = {| state := 1 + state x; value := value x |} \/
value x < value (step M x).
Proof.
move=> ? ?. rewrite /step. have ->: value x = S (value x - 1) by lia.
move Ho: (nth_error M (state x)) => o. case: o Ho; first last.
{ move /nth_error_None. by lia. }
move=> [j n] _. case H: (S (value x - 1) mod (n + 1)); last by left.
right => /=. by apply: mod_frac_lt.
Qed.
Definition config_weight (M: Cm1) : Config -> nat :=
fun '{| state := p; value := v |} => p + length M * v.
Lemma config_weight_step_monotone {M: Cm1} {x: Config} :
not (halting M x) -> config_weight M x < config_weight M (step M x).
Proof.
move=> Hx. suff: not (config_weight M (step M x) <= config_weight M x) by lia.
move: x Hx => [p v].
rewrite /config_weight /=. case: v => [|v].
{ move=> + /ltac:(exfalso). by apply. }
move Ho: (nth_error M p) => o. case: o Ho; first last.
{ move=> Hp + /ltac:(exfalso). apply. move=> /=. by rewrite Hp. }
move=> [j n] Hp ?. case Hr: (S v mod (n + 1)); last by lia.
have := mod_frac_lt Hr.
have : p < length M.
{ apply /nth_error_Some. by rewrite Hp. }
by nia.
Qed.
Lemma config_weight_run_monotone {M: Cm1} {x: Config} {n: nat} :
not (halting M (Nat.iter n (step M) x)) -> config_weight M x < config_weight M (Nat.iter (1+n) (step M) x).
Proof.
elim: n; first by move /config_weight_step_monotone.
move=> n IH HSn.
have /IH : not (halting M (Nat.iter n (step M) x)).
{ move=> Hn. apply: HSn. move: Hn. apply: halting_monotone. by lia. }
have := config_weight_step_monotone HSn.
move=> /=. by lia.
Qed.
Theorem acyclicity {M: Cm1} {n: nat} {x: Config} :
not (halting M (Nat.iter n (step M) x)) ->
NoDup (map (fun i => Nat.iter i (step M) x) (seq 0 (2+n))).
Proof.
elim: n.
{ move=> /= Hx.
apply: NoDup_cons; first by case.
by apply: NoDup_cons; [ case | apply: NoDup_nil ]. }
move=> n IH HSn.
have /IH : not (halting M (Nat.iter n (step M) x)).
{ move=> Hn. apply: HSn. move: Hn. apply: halting_monotone. by lia. }
have ->: seq 0 (2 + S n) = seq 0 (2 + n) ++ [2 + n].
{ have ->: 2 + S n = (2 + n) + 1 by lia. by rewrite [seq 0 (2 + n + 1)] seq_app. }
rewrite map_app.
set f := (fun i : nat => Nat.iter i (step M) x).
have : Add (f (2+n)) (map f (seq 0 (2 + n)) ++ []) (map f (seq 0 (2 + n)) ++ map f [2 + n]) by apply: Add_app.
rewrite app_nil_r. move /(@NoDup_Add Config) => H Hfn.
apply /H. constructor; first done.
rewrite in_map_iff. move=> [i]. rewrite in_seq /f. move=> [+ ?].
have ->: 2 + n = i + (1 + (1+n - i)) by lia.
rewrite iter_plus. set x' := Nat.iter i (step M) x.
move=> Hx'.
suff: config_weight M x' < config_weight M (Nat.iter (1 + (1+n - i)) (step M) x').
{ rewrite -Hx'. by lia. }
apply: config_weight_run_monotone. subst x'.
rewrite -iter_plus. by have ->: i + (1 + n - i) = S n by lia.
Qed.
Import ListNotations.
Require Import Undecidability.CounterMachines.CM1.
Require Import Undecidability.CounterMachines.Util.Nat_facts.
Require Import ssreflect ssrbool ssrfun.
Set Default Goal Selector "!".
Lemma haltingP {M : Cm1} {x: Config}:
halting M x <-> (length M <= state x \/ value x = 0).
Proof.
move: x => [p c] /=.
constructor; first last.
{ case; rewrite /halting /=; last by move=> ->.
move: c => [|c]; first done. by move=> /nth_error_None ->. }
have [* | /nth_error_Some] : length M <= p \/ p < length M by lia.
{ by left. }
rewrite /halting /=.
move: c => [|c]; first by (move=> *; right).
case: (nth_error M p); last done.
move=> [q n] _. move Hr: (S c mod (n + 1)) => r.
move: r Hr => [/mod_frac_lt |r _ [?]]; last by lia.
move: (S c) => ? ? []. lia.
Qed.
Lemma halting_monotone {M : Cm1} {x: Config} {n m: nat} : n <= m ->
halting M (Nat.iter n (step M) x) -> halting M (Nat.iter m (step M) x).
Proof.
move=> ? ?. have -> : m = n + (m-n) by lia.
rewrite iter_plus. elim: (m-n); first done.
move=> * /=. by congruence.
Qed.
Lemma step_value_monotone (M : Cm1) (x: Config) :
value x <= value (step M x).
Proof.
move: x => [p [|c]] /=; first by lia.
case: (nth_error M p) => /=; last by lia.
move=> [j n]. move Hr: (S c mod (n + 1)) => [|r] /=; last by lia.
have := mod_frac_lt Hr. move=> /=. by lia.
Qed.
Lemma run_value_monotone (M : Cm1) (x: Config) (n: nat) :
value x <= value (Nat.iter n (step M) x).
Proof.
elim: n=> /=; first by lia.
move=> n IH. have := step_value_monotone M (Nat.iter n (step M) x).
by lia.
Qed.
Lemma value_monotone {M : Cm1} {x: Config} {n m: nat} :
n <= m -> value (Nat.iter n (step M) x) <= value (Nat.iter m (step M) x).
Proof.
move=> ?. have ->: (m = n + (m - n)) by lia.
rewrite iter_plus. by apply: run_value_monotone.
Qed.
Lemma inc_value_mod {M : Cm1} {p: Config} : value p < value (step M p) ->
exists t, nth_error M (state p) = Some t /\ ((value p) mod ((snd t)+1) = 0).
Proof.
rewrite /step. move: p => [i [|c]] /=; first by lia.
case: (nth_error M i) => /=; last by lia.
move=> [j n]. move Hr: (S c mod (n + 1)) => [|r] /=; last by lia.
move=> _. by exists (j, n).
Qed.
Lemma step_progress (M : Cm1) (x: Config) :
state x < length M -> 1 <= value x ->
step M x = {| state := 1 + state x; value := value x |} \/
value x < value (step M x).
Proof.
move=> ? ?. rewrite /step. have ->: value x = S (value x - 1) by lia.
move Ho: (nth_error M (state x)) => o. case: o Ho; first last.
{ move /nth_error_None. by lia. }
move=> [j n] _. case H: (S (value x - 1) mod (n + 1)); last by left.
right => /=. by apply: mod_frac_lt.
Qed.
Definition config_weight (M: Cm1) : Config -> nat :=
fun '{| state := p; value := v |} => p + length M * v.
Lemma config_weight_step_monotone {M: Cm1} {x: Config} :
not (halting M x) -> config_weight M x < config_weight M (step M x).
Proof.
move=> Hx. suff: not (config_weight M (step M x) <= config_weight M x) by lia.
move: x Hx => [p v].
rewrite /config_weight /=. case: v => [|v].
{ move=> + /ltac:(exfalso). by apply. }
move Ho: (nth_error M p) => o. case: o Ho; first last.
{ move=> Hp + /ltac:(exfalso). apply. move=> /=. by rewrite Hp. }
move=> [j n] Hp ?. case Hr: (S v mod (n + 1)); last by lia.
have := mod_frac_lt Hr.
have : p < length M.
{ apply /nth_error_Some. by rewrite Hp. }
by nia.
Qed.
Lemma config_weight_run_monotone {M: Cm1} {x: Config} {n: nat} :
not (halting M (Nat.iter n (step M) x)) -> config_weight M x < config_weight M (Nat.iter (1+n) (step M) x).
Proof.
elim: n; first by move /config_weight_step_monotone.
move=> n IH HSn.
have /IH : not (halting M (Nat.iter n (step M) x)).
{ move=> Hn. apply: HSn. move: Hn. apply: halting_monotone. by lia. }
have := config_weight_step_monotone HSn.
move=> /=. by lia.
Qed.
Theorem acyclicity {M: Cm1} {n: nat} {x: Config} :
not (halting M (Nat.iter n (step M) x)) ->
NoDup (map (fun i => Nat.iter i (step M) x) (seq 0 (2+n))).
Proof.
elim: n.
{ move=> /= Hx.
apply: NoDup_cons; first by case.
by apply: NoDup_cons; [ case | apply: NoDup_nil ]. }
move=> n IH HSn.
have /IH : not (halting M (Nat.iter n (step M) x)).
{ move=> Hn. apply: HSn. move: Hn. apply: halting_monotone. by lia. }
have ->: seq 0 (2 + S n) = seq 0 (2 + n) ++ [2 + n].
{ have ->: 2 + S n = (2 + n) + 1 by lia. by rewrite [seq 0 (2 + n + 1)] seq_app. }
rewrite map_app.
set f := (fun i : nat => Nat.iter i (step M) x).
have : Add (f (2+n)) (map f (seq 0 (2 + n)) ++ []) (map f (seq 0 (2 + n)) ++ map f [2 + n]) by apply: Add_app.
rewrite app_nil_r. move /(@NoDup_Add Config) => H Hfn.
apply /H. constructor; first done.
rewrite in_map_iff. move=> [i]. rewrite in_seq /f. move=> [+ ?].
have ->: 2 + n = i + (1 + (1+n - i)) by lia.
rewrite iter_plus. set x' := Nat.iter i (step M) x.
move=> Hx'.
suff: config_weight M x' < config_weight M (Nat.iter (1 + (1+n - i)) (step M) x').
{ rewrite -Hx'. by lia. }
apply: config_weight_run_monotone. subst x'.
rewrite -iter_plus. by have ->: i + (1 + n - i) = S n by lia.
Qed.