From Undecidability.TM Require Import ProgrammingTools.
From Undecidability Require Import EncodeBinNumbers PosDefinitions PosPointers PosHelperMachines.
Global Instance comparison_eq_dec : eq_dec comparison.
Proof.
intros. hnf. decide equality.
Defined.
Global Instance comparison_finC : finTypeC (EqType comparison).
Proof.
apply (FinTypeC (enum := [Eq; Lt; Gt])).
intros []; now cbv.
Qed.
Global Instance comparison_inhabited : inhabitedC comparison.
Proof. repeat constructor. Qed.
Definition Compare_Step_Rel (r : comparison) : pRel sigPos^+ (comparison+comparison) 2 :=
fun tin '(yout, tout) =>
(forall (p0 : positive) (b0 : bool) (bits0 : list bool) (p1 : positive) (b1 : bool) (bits1 : list bool),
atBit tin[@Fin0] p0 b0 bits0 ->
atBit tin[@Fin1] p1 b1 bits1 ->
match yout, b0, b1 with
| inl r', true, true =>
movedToLeft tout[@Fin0] p0 b0 bits0 /\
movedToLeft tout[@Fin1] p1 b1 bits1 /\
r' = r
| inl Gt, true, false =>
movedToLeft tout[@Fin0] p0 b0 bits0 /\
movedToLeft tout[@Fin1] p1 b1 bits1
| inl Lt, false, true =>
movedToLeft tout[@Fin0] p0 b0 bits0 /\
movedToLeft tout[@Fin1] p1 b1 bits1
| inl r', false, false =>
movedToLeft tout[@Fin0] p0 b0 bits0 /\
movedToLeft tout[@Fin1] p1 b1 bits1 /\
r' = r
| _, _, _ => False
end) /\
(forall (p0 : positive) (b0 : bool) (bits0 : list bool) (p1 : positive),
atBit tin[@Fin0] p0 b0 bits0 ->
atHSB tin[@Fin1] p1 ->
yout = inr Gt /\
atHSB tout[@Fin0] (append_bits p0 (b0 :: bits0)) /\
atHSB tout[@Fin1] p1) /\
(forall (p0 : positive) (p1 : positive) (b1 : bool) (bits1 : list bool),
atHSB tin[@Fin0] p0 ->
atBit tin[@Fin1] p1 b1 bits1 ->
yout = inr Lt /\
atHSB tout[@Fin0] p0 /\
atHSB tout[@Fin1] (append_bits p1 (b1 :: bits1))) /\
(forall (p0 p1 : positive),
atHSB tin[@Fin0] p0 ->
atHSB tin[@Fin1] p1 ->
tout = tin /\ yout = inr r).
Definition Compare_Step (r : comparison) : pTM sigPos^+ (comparison+comparison) 2 :=
Switch ReadPosSym2
(fun '(s0, s1) =>
match s0, s1 with
| Some true, Some true => Return (SetBitAndMoveLeft true @[|Fin0|];; SetBitAndMoveLeft true @[|Fin1|]) (inl r)
| Some true, Some false => Return (SetBitAndMoveLeft true @[|Fin0|];; SetBitAndMoveLeft false @[|Fin1|]) (inl Gt)
| Some false, Some true => Return (SetBitAndMoveLeft false @[|Fin0|];; SetBitAndMoveLeft true @[|Fin1|]) (inl Lt)
| Some false, Some false => Return (SetBitAndMoveLeft false @[|Fin0|];; SetBitAndMoveLeft false @[|Fin1|]) (inl r)
| Some _, None => Return (GoToHSB @[|Fin0|]) (inr Gt)
| None , Some b => Return (GoToHSB @[|Fin1|]) (inr Lt)
| None , None => Return Nop (inr r)
end).
Lemma Compare_Step_Realise (r : comparison) : Compare_Step r ⊨ Compare_Step_Rel r.
Proof.
eapply Realise_monotone.
{ unfold Compare_Step. cbn.
eapply Switch_Realise
with (R2 := fun '(s0, s1) => match s0, s1 with
| Some b0, Some b1 => match b0, b1 with
| true, true => _
| true, false => _
| false, true => _
| false, false => _
end
| Some b0, None => _ | None, Some b1 => _ | None, None => _ end).
- eapply RealiseIn_Realise. apply ReadPosSym2_Sem.
- intros [s0 s1]. cbn. destruct s0 as [ b0 | ], s1 as [ b1 | ]; cbn; TM_Correct.
+ destruct b0, b1; TM_Correct; eapply RealiseIn_Realise, SetBitAndMoveLeft_Sem.
+ destruct b0; TM_Correct; apply GoToHSB_Realise.
+ destruct b1; TM_Correct; apply GoToHSB_Realise. }
{
intros tin (yout, tout) H. TMSimp.
rename H into HReadSym1, H1 into HReadSym2, H2 into HReadSym3, H3 into HReadSym4. rename H0 into HSwitch. rename o into s0, o0 into s1.
split; [ | split; [ | split ] ]; auto.
- intros. modpon HReadSym1. clear HReadSym2 HReadSym3 HReadSym4.
destruct s0 as [ b0' | ], s1 as [ b1' | ]; cbn in *; auto.
+ destruct b0' eqn:Eb0', b1' eqn:Eb1', b0, b1; TMSimp; eauto.
all: destruct r; cbn; eauto.
+ destruct b0'; auto.
- intros. modpon HReadSym2. clear HReadSym1 HReadSym3 HReadSym4.
destruct s0 as [ b0' | ], s1 as [ b1' | ]; cbn in *; auto.
+ destruct b0' eqn:Eb0', b1' eqn:Eb1', b0; TMSimp; eauto.
+ TMSimp. destruct b0'; auto.
* destruct b0; auto. split; eauto. TMSimp. modpon H2. auto.
* destruct b0; auto. split; eauto. TMSimp. modpon H2. auto.
- intros. modpon HReadSym3. clear HReadSym1 HReadSym2 HReadSym4.
destruct s0 as [ b0' | ], s1 as [ b1' | ]; cbn in *; auto.
TMSimp. destruct b1' eqn:Eb1', b1; TMSimp; eauto.
* modpon H2. repeat split; eauto.
* modpon H2. repeat split; eauto.
- intros. modpon HReadSym4. clear HReadSym1 HReadSym2 HReadSym3.
destruct s0 as [ b0' | ]; eauto; try inv_pair. TMSimp. auto.
}
Qed.
Definition Compare_Loop : comparison -> pTM sigPos^+ comparison 2 := StateWhile Compare_Step.
Definition Compare_Loop_Rel (r : comparison) : pRel sigPos^+ comparison 2 :=
fun tin '(yout, tout) =>
(forall (p0 : positive) (b0 : bool) (bits0 : list bool) (p1 : positive) (b1 : bool) (bits1 : list bool),
atBit tin[@Fin0] p0 b0 bits0 ->
atBit tin[@Fin1] p1 b1 bits1 ->
atHSB tout[@Fin0] (append_bits p0 (b0 :: bits0)) /\
atHSB tout[@Fin1] (append_bits p1 (b1 :: bits1)) /\
yout = Pos.compare_cont r (p0 ~~ b0) (p1 ~~ b1)) /\
(forall (p0 : positive) (b0 : bool) (bits0 : list bool) (p1 : positive),
atBit tin[@Fin0] p0 b0 bits0 ->
atHSB tin[@Fin1] p1 ->
atHSB tout[@Fin0] (append_bits p0 (b0 :: bits0)) /\
atHSB tout[@Fin1] p1 /\
yout = Gt) /\
(forall (p0 : positive) (p1 : positive) (b1 : bool) (bits1 : list bool),
atHSB tin[@Fin0] p0 ->
atBit tin[@Fin1] p1 b1 bits1 ->
atHSB tout[@Fin0] p0 /\
atHSB tout[@Fin1] (append_bits p1 (b1 :: bits1)) /\
yout = Lt) /\
(forall (p0 p1 : positive),
atHSB tin[@Fin0] p0 ->
atHSB tin[@Fin1] p1 ->
tout = tin /\ yout = r).
Lemma Compare_Loop_Realise (r : comparison) : Compare_Loop r ⊨ Compare_Loop_Rel r.
Proof.
eapply Realise_monotone.
{ unfold Compare_Loop. TM_Correct. exact Compare_Step_Realise. }
{
apply StateWhileInduction; intros.
{
cbn in *. destruct HLastStep as (HLastStepA&HLastStepB&HLastStepC&HLastStepD). split; [ | split; [ | split ]].
- intros. modpon HLastStepA. auto.
- intros. modpon HLastStepB. inv HLastStepB. repeat split; eauto.
- intros. modpon HLastStepC. inv HLastStepC. repeat split; eauto.
- intros. modpon HLastStepD. inv HLastStepD0. repeat split; eauto.
}
{
cbn in *. destruct HLastStep as (HLastStepA&HLastStepB&HLastStepC&HLastStepD). destruct HStar as (HStarA&HStarB&HStarC&HStarD). split; [ | split; [ | split ]].
- intros. modpon HStarA.
destruct l'; cbn in *; eauto.
+ destruct b0, b1; cbn in *; eauto.
* modpon HStarA; TMSimp.
destruct p0, p1; cbn in *; eauto.
all: solve [modpon HLastStepA; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepB; [ TMSimp; auto ]
| modpon HLastStepC; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepD; [ TMSimp; auto ]].
* modpon HStarA; TMSimp.
destruct p0, p1; cbn in *; eauto.
all: solve [ modpon HLastStepA; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepB; [ TMSimp; auto ]
| modpon HLastStepC; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepD; [ TMSimp; auto ]].
+ destruct b0, b1; cbn in *; eauto.
* modpon HStarA; TMSimp.
destruct p0, p1; cbn in *; eauto.
all: solve [ modpon HLastStepA; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepB; [ TMSimp; auto ]
| modpon HLastStepC; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepD; [ TMSimp; auto ]].
* modpon HStarA; TMSimp.
destruct p0, p1; cbn in *; eauto.
all: solve [ modpon HLastStepA; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepB; [ TMSimp; auto ]
| modpon HLastStepC; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepD; [ TMSimp; auto ]].
* modpon HStarA; TMSimp.
destruct p0, p1; cbn in *; eauto.
all: solve [ modpon HLastStepA; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepB; [ TMSimp; auto ]
| modpon HLastStepC; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepD; [ TMSimp; auto ]].
+ destruct b0, b1; cbn in *; eauto.
* modpon HStarA; TMSimp.
destruct p0, p1; cbn in *; eauto.
all: solve [ modpon HLastStepA; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepB; [ TMSimp; auto ]
| modpon HLastStepC; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepD; [ TMSimp; auto ]].
* modpon HStarA; TMSimp.
destruct p0, p1; cbn in *; eauto.
all: solve [ modpon HLastStepA; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepB; [ TMSimp; auto ]
| modpon HLastStepC; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepD; [ TMSimp; auto ]].
* modpon HStarA; TMSimp.
destruct p0, p1; cbn in *; eauto.
all: solve [ modpon HLastStepA; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepB; [ TMSimp; auto ]
| modpon HLastStepC; [ TMSimp; auto ] | modpon HLastStepD; [ TMSimp; auto ]].
- intros. modpon HStarB. congruence.
- intros. modpon HStarC. congruence.
- intros. modpon HStarD. congruence.
}
}
Qed.
Definition Compare := GoToLSB_start@[|Fin0|];; GoToLSB_start@[|Fin1|];;
Switch (Compare_Loop Eq) (fun (r : comparison) => Return ((Move Lmove)@[|Fin0|];; (Move Lmove)@[|Fin1|]) r).
Definition Compare_Rel : pRel sigPos^+ comparison 2 :=
fun tin '(yout, tout) =>
forall (p0 p1 : positive),
tin[@Fin0] ≃ p0 ->
tin[@Fin1] ≃ p1 ->
tout[@Fin0] ≃ p0 /\
tout[@Fin1] ≃ p1 /\
yout = Pos.compare p0 p1.
Lemma Compare_Realise : Compare ⊨ Compare_Rel.
Proof.
eapply Realise_monotone.
{ unfold Compare. TM_Correct.
- apply GoToLSB_start_Realise.
- apply GoToLSB_start_Realise.
- apply Compare_Loop_Realise. }
{
intros tin (yout, tout) H. TMSimp. intros.
rename H2 into HLoopA, H5 into HLoopB, H6 into HLoopC, H7 into HLoopD.
rename H4 into HSwitch. rename H into HGoToHSB', H0 into HGoToHSB.
modpon HGoToHSB. modpon HGoToHSB'.
destruct p0, p1.
- modpon HLoopA. TMSimp. unfold Pos.compare. destruct (Pos.compare_cont Eq p0 p1); TMSimp; (repeat split; eauto; now apply atHSB_moveLeft_contains).
- modpon HLoopA. TMSimp. unfold Pos.compare. destruct (Pos.compare_cont Gt p0 p1); TMSimp; (repeat split; eauto; now apply atHSB_moveLeft_contains).
- modpon HLoopB. TMSimp. unfold Pos.compare. (repeat split; eauto; now apply atHSB_moveLeft_contains).
- modpon HLoopA. TMSimp. unfold Pos.compare. destruct (Pos.compare_cont Lt p0 p1); TMSimp; (repeat split; eauto; now apply atHSB_moveLeft_contains).
- modpon HLoopA. TMSimp. unfold Pos.compare. destruct (Pos.compare_cont Eq p0 p1); TMSimp; (repeat split; eauto; now apply atHSB_moveLeft_contains).
- modpon HLoopB. TMSimp. unfold Pos.compare. (repeat split; eauto; now apply atHSB_moveLeft_contains).
- modpon HLoopC. TMSimp. unfold Pos.compare. (repeat split; eauto; now apply atHSB_moveLeft_contains).
- modpon HLoopC. TMSimp. unfold Pos.compare. (repeat split; eauto; now apply atHSB_moveLeft_contains).
- modpon HLoopD. TMSimp. unfold Pos.compare. (repeat split; eauto; now apply atHSB_moveLeft_contains).
}
Qed.
Definition Max_Rel : pRel sigPos^+ comparison 3 :=
fun tin '(yout, tout) =>
forall (p0 p1 : positive),
tin[@Fin0] ≃ p0 ->
tin[@Fin1] ≃ p1 ->
isVoid tin[@Fin2] ->
tout[@Fin0] ≃ p0 /\
tout[@Fin1] ≃ p1 /\
tout[@Fin2] ≃ Pos.max p0 p1 /\
yout = Pos.compare p0 p1.
Definition Max : pTM sigPos^+ comparison 3 :=
Switch (Compare @[|Fin0; Fin1|])
(fun (c : comparison) =>
match c with
| Gt => Return (CopyValue _ @[|Fin0; Fin2|]) c
| _ => Return (CopyValue _ @[|Fin1; Fin2|]) c
end).
Lemma Max_Realise : Max ⊨ Max_Rel.
Proof.
eapply Realise_monotone.
{ unfold Max. TM_Correct.
- apply Compare_Realise.
}
{
intros tin (yout, tout) H. cbn in *. intros p0 p1 Hp0 Hp1 HRight. TMSimp.
modpon H. destruct ymid.
- TMSimp. modpon H3. repeat split; eauto. unfold Pos.max. rewrite <- H2. auto.
- TMSimp. modpon H3. repeat split; eauto. unfold Pos.max. rewrite <- H2. auto.
- TMSimp. modpon H3. repeat split; eauto. unfold Pos.max. rewrite <- H2. auto.
}
Qed.