Library ProgrammingTuringMachines.TM.Compound.TMTac
Ltac dec_pos P := let H := fresh in destruct (Dec P) as [_ | H]; [ | now contradiction H].
Ltac dec_neg P := let H := fresh in destruct (Dec P) as [H | _]; [now contradiction H | ].
Ltac simpl_dec :=
match goal with
| [ H : context [ Dec (?x = ?x) ] |- _ ] => dec_pos (x=x)
| [ |- context [ Dec (?x = ?x) ]] => dec_pos (x=x)
| [ _ : ?H |- context [ Dec ?H ]] => dec_pos H
| [ _ : ~ ?H |- context [ Dec ?H ]] => dec_neg H
| [ _ : ?H, _ : context [ Dec ?H ] |- _] => dec_pos H
| [ _ : ~ ?H, _ : context [ Dec ?H ] |- _] => dec_neg H
| _ => fail "could not match goal"
end.
Section test.
Variable P : Prop.
Variable dec_P : dec P.
Goal if Dec (1 = 1) then True else False.
Proof.
intros. deq 1. tauto.
Qed.
Goal P -> if (Dec P) then True else False.
Proof.
intros. simpl_dec. tauto.
Qed.
Goal ~ P -> if (Dec P) then False else True.
Proof.
intros. simpl_dec. tauto.
Qed.
Goal P -> (if (Dec P) then False else True) -> False.
Proof.
intros. simpl_dec. tauto.
Qed.
Goal ~ P -> (if (Dec P) then True else False) -> False.
Proof.
intros. simpl_dec. tauto.
Qed.
End test.
Ltac inv_pair :=
match goal with
| [ H : (_, _) = (_, _) |- _] => inv H
| [ |- (_, _) = (_, _) ] => f_equal
end.
Ltac destruct_param_tape_pair :=
match goal with
| [ x : _ * tapes _ _ |- _] =>
let ymid := fresh "ymid" in
let tmid := fresh "tmid" in
destruct x as (ymid&tmid)
end.
Ltac destruct_unit :=
repeat match goal with
| [ x : unit |- _ ] => destruct x
end.
TMSimp destructs conjunctive assumptions and rewrites assumptions like t'[@i] = t[@j] automatically.
Ltac TMSimp1 T :=
try destruct_param_tape_pair; destruct_unit;
simpl_not_in;
cbn in *;
subst;
unfold finType_CS in *;
try T;
match goal with
| [ H : _ ::: _ = [||] |- _ ] => inv H
| [ H : [||] = _ ::: _ |- _ ] => inv H
| [ H : _ ::: _ = _ ::: _ |- _ ] => apply VectorSpec.cons_inj in H
| [ H : _ :: _ = [] |- _ ] => inv H
| [ H : [] = _ :: _ |- _ ] => inv H
| [ H : _ :: _ = _ :: _ |- _ ] => inv H
| [ H : Some _ = Some _ |- _ ] => inv H
| [ H : None = Some _ |- _ ] => inv H
| [ H : Some _ = None |- _ ] => inv H
| [ H : _ /\ _ |- _] => destruct H
| [ H : ex ?P |- _] =>
match type of P with
| tapes _ _ -> Prop =>
let tmid := fresh "tmid" in
destruct H as (tmid&H)
| _ => (* probably some label *)
let ymid := fresh "ymid" in
destruct H as (ymid&H)
end
| [ x : _ * _ |- _ ] => destruct x
| _ => idtac
end.
Ltac TMSimp2 :=
match goal with
| [ H: ?X = _ |- _ ] => rewrite H in *; lock H
end.
Tactic Notation "TMSimp" tactic(T) :=
repeat progress (repeat progress TMSimp1 T; repeat TMSimp2; unlock all).
Tactic Notation "TMSimp" := TMSimp idtac.
Rewrite eq-assumptions, but only in the goal. This is much faster than TMSimp.
DO NOT USE THE FOLLOWING (deprecated) TACTICS, except in TM.Compound!
Tactic Notation "TMBranche" :=
(
match goal with
| [ H : context [ match ?x with _ => _ end ] |- _ ] => let E := fresh "E" in destruct x eqn:E
| [ |- context [ match ?x with _ => _ end ] ] => let E := fresh "E" in destruct x eqn:E
| [ H : _ \/ _ |- _] => destruct H
| [ IH : ?P -> ?Q |- _] =>
match type of P with
| Prop => spec_assert IH; [ clear IH | ]
end
| [ x : bool |- _ ] => destruct x
| [ x : option _ |- _ ] => destruct x
| [ |- ex ?P ] => eexists
| [ H : _ \/ _ |- _] => destruct H
end
).
Tactic Notation "TMSolve" int_or_var(k) :=
repeat progress first [
match goal with
| [ |- (_ ::: _) = (_ ::: _) ] => f_equal
| [ |- Some _ = Some _ ] => f_equal
| [ |- _ /\ _ ] => split
end
|| congruence
|| eauto k
].
Tactic Notation "TMCrush" tactic(T) :=
repeat progress
(
TMSimp T;
try TMBranche
).
Tactic Notation "TMCrush" :=
repeat progress
(
TMSimp;
try TMBranche
).