Plain.Context
Require Import Omega List Program.Equality.
Require Import Autosubst.Autosubst.
Fixpoint atn {X} l n (x : X) :=
match l with
| nil => False
| y :: l' => match n with
| 0 => x = y
| S n' => atn l' n' x
end
end.
Section SubstInstance.
Context {term : Type}.
Context {Ids_term : Ids term} {Rename_term : Rename term}
{Subst_term : Subst term} {SubstLemmas_term : SubstLemmas term}.
Inductive atnd: list term -> var -> term -> Prop :=
| Atnd0 Delta A A' :
A' = A.[ren(+1)] -> atnd (A :: Delta) 0 A'
| AtndS Delta x A B B' :
atnd Delta x B -> B' = B.[ren(+1)] -> atnd (A :: Delta) (S x) B'.
Lemma atn_mmap {f : term -> term} {Gamma x A A'} :
atn Gamma x A -> A' = (f A) -> atn (mmap f Gamma) x A'.
Proof.
revert x.
induction Gamma; intros; simpl in *; trivial.
destruct x; subst; eauto.
Qed.
Lemma mmap_atn {f : term -> term} {Gamma x A'} :
atn (mmap f Gamma) x A' -> exists A, A' = (f A) /\ atn Gamma x A.
Proof.
revert x. induction Gamma; intros; simpl in *.
- contradiction.
- destruct x; subst; eauto.
Qed.
Lemma up_mmap_atn zeta xi Gamma1 Gamma2 A x :
(forall x B, atn Gamma1 x B -> atn Gamma2 (zeta x) B.[ren xi]) ->
atn (mmap (subst (ren (+1))) Gamma1) x A ->
atn (mmap (subst (ren (+1))) Gamma2) (zeta x) A.[ren (0 .: xi >>> (+1))].
Proof.
intros H1 H2.
edestruct (mmap_atn H2) as [? [? ?]]. subst.
eapply atn_mmap; eauto. autosubst.
Qed.
Lemma up_atnd xi Delta1 Delta2 A B x:
(forall x C, atnd Delta1 x C -> atnd Delta2 (xi x) C.[ren xi]) ->
atnd (A :: Delta1) x B ->
atnd (A.[ren xi] :: Delta2) ((0 .: xi >>> (+1)) x) B.[ren (0 .: xi >>> (+1))].
Proof.
intros H1 H2; destruct x; simpl; inv H2; econstructor; eauto; autosubst.
Qed.
Lemma atnd_steps x Gamma Delta A :
atnd Gamma x A <->
atnd (Delta ++ Gamma) (length Delta + x) A.[ren(+(length Delta))].
Proof.
revert A x.
induction Delta; intros.
- split.
+ autosubst.
+ autosubst.
- simpl. cutrewrite (A.[ren (+S (length Delta))] =
A.[ren(+length Delta)].[ren(+1)]); [idtac|autosubst].
split.
+ econstructor. eapply IHDelta; eassumption. reflexivity.
+ intros H. inv H. rewrite IHDelta. apply lift_inj in H5.
subst. eassumption.
Qed.
Lemma atnd_steps' x Gamma Delta A :
atnd (Delta ++ Gamma) (x + length Delta) A ->
exists B, A = B.[ren(+(length Delta))] /\ atnd Gamma x B.
Proof.
revert A x.
induction Delta; intros.
- exists A.
simpl in H.
rewrite plus_0_r in H. intuition autosubst.
- asimpl. simpl in *.
rewrite plusnS in *.
inv H.
edestruct IHDelta as [B' [? ?]]; eauto. exists B'. subst.
intuition autosubst.
Qed.
Corollary atnd_step Delta A x B :
atnd Delta x A <-> atnd (B :: Delta) (S x) A.[ren(+1)].
Proof.
apply atnd_steps with (Delta := B :: nil).
Qed.
Lemma atnd_repl Gamma A Delta :
(atnd (Delta ++ A :: Gamma) (length Delta) A.[ren(+ S (length Delta))]) /\
(forall x B A',
x <> length Delta -> atnd (Delta ++ A :: Gamma) x B ->
atnd (Delta ++ A' :: Gamma) x B).
Proof.
split.
- pose proof (atnd_steps 0 (A :: Gamma) Delta A.[ren(+1)]) as H. asimpl in H.
apply H. now constructor.
- intros x. revert Gamma A Delta.
induction x; intros Gamma A Delta H B A' H_atn.
+ destruct Delta as [| C Delta]. { now intuition. }
simpl in *.
inv H_atn. now constructor.
+ destruct Delta as [| C Delta]; simpl in *.
* inv H_atn. econstructor. eassumption. reflexivity.
* inv H_atn. econstructor. eapply IHx; eauto. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma atnd_defined Delta x : (exists B, atnd Delta x B) <-> x < length Delta.
Proof.
revert x. induction Delta; intuition; asimpl in *; ainv.
- destruct x. omega. cut(x < length Delta). omega.
ainv. firstorder.
- destruct x.
+ eexists. now econstructor.
+ edestruct IHDelta as [_ [? ?]]. cut(x < length Delta); eauto. omega.
eexists. econstructor; eauto.
Qed.
End SubstInstance.
(* Local Variables: *)
(* coq-load-path: (("." "Plain") ("../../theories" "Autosubst")) *)
(* End: *)
Require Import Autosubst.Autosubst.
Fixpoint atn {X} l n (x : X) :=
match l with
| nil => False
| y :: l' => match n with
| 0 => x = y
| S n' => atn l' n' x
end
end.
Section SubstInstance.
Context {term : Type}.
Context {Ids_term : Ids term} {Rename_term : Rename term}
{Subst_term : Subst term} {SubstLemmas_term : SubstLemmas term}.
Inductive atnd: list term -> var -> term -> Prop :=
| Atnd0 Delta A A' :
A' = A.[ren(+1)] -> atnd (A :: Delta) 0 A'
| AtndS Delta x A B B' :
atnd Delta x B -> B' = B.[ren(+1)] -> atnd (A :: Delta) (S x) B'.
Lemma atn_mmap {f : term -> term} {Gamma x A A'} :
atn Gamma x A -> A' = (f A) -> atn (mmap f Gamma) x A'.
Proof.
revert x.
induction Gamma; intros; simpl in *; trivial.
destruct x; subst; eauto.
Qed.
Lemma mmap_atn {f : term -> term} {Gamma x A'} :
atn (mmap f Gamma) x A' -> exists A, A' = (f A) /\ atn Gamma x A.
Proof.
revert x. induction Gamma; intros; simpl in *.
- contradiction.
- destruct x; subst; eauto.
Qed.
Lemma up_mmap_atn zeta xi Gamma1 Gamma2 A x :
(forall x B, atn Gamma1 x B -> atn Gamma2 (zeta x) B.[ren xi]) ->
atn (mmap (subst (ren (+1))) Gamma1) x A ->
atn (mmap (subst (ren (+1))) Gamma2) (zeta x) A.[ren (0 .: xi >>> (+1))].
Proof.
intros H1 H2.
edestruct (mmap_atn H2) as [? [? ?]]. subst.
eapply atn_mmap; eauto. autosubst.
Qed.
Lemma up_atnd xi Delta1 Delta2 A B x:
(forall x C, atnd Delta1 x C -> atnd Delta2 (xi x) C.[ren xi]) ->
atnd (A :: Delta1) x B ->
atnd (A.[ren xi] :: Delta2) ((0 .: xi >>> (+1)) x) B.[ren (0 .: xi >>> (+1))].
Proof.
intros H1 H2; destruct x; simpl; inv H2; econstructor; eauto; autosubst.
Qed.
Lemma atnd_steps x Gamma Delta A :
atnd Gamma x A <->
atnd (Delta ++ Gamma) (length Delta + x) A.[ren(+(length Delta))].
Proof.
revert A x.
induction Delta; intros.
- split.
+ autosubst.
+ autosubst.
- simpl. cutrewrite (A.[ren (+S (length Delta))] =
A.[ren(+length Delta)].[ren(+1)]); [idtac|autosubst].
split.
+ econstructor. eapply IHDelta; eassumption. reflexivity.
+ intros H. inv H. rewrite IHDelta. apply lift_inj in H5.
subst. eassumption.
Qed.
Lemma atnd_steps' x Gamma Delta A :
atnd (Delta ++ Gamma) (x + length Delta) A ->
exists B, A = B.[ren(+(length Delta))] /\ atnd Gamma x B.
Proof.
revert A x.
induction Delta; intros.
- exists A.
simpl in H.
rewrite plus_0_r in H. intuition autosubst.
- asimpl. simpl in *.
rewrite plusnS in *.
inv H.
edestruct IHDelta as [B' [? ?]]; eauto. exists B'. subst.
intuition autosubst.
Qed.
Corollary atnd_step Delta A x B :
atnd Delta x A <-> atnd (B :: Delta) (S x) A.[ren(+1)].
Proof.
apply atnd_steps with (Delta := B :: nil).
Qed.
Lemma atnd_repl Gamma A Delta :
(atnd (Delta ++ A :: Gamma) (length Delta) A.[ren(+ S (length Delta))]) /\
(forall x B A',
x <> length Delta -> atnd (Delta ++ A :: Gamma) x B ->
atnd (Delta ++ A' :: Gamma) x B).
Proof.
split.
- pose proof (atnd_steps 0 (A :: Gamma) Delta A.[ren(+1)]) as H. asimpl in H.
apply H. now constructor.
- intros x. revert Gamma A Delta.
induction x; intros Gamma A Delta H B A' H_atn.
+ destruct Delta as [| C Delta]. { now intuition. }
simpl in *.
inv H_atn. now constructor.
+ destruct Delta as [| C Delta]; simpl in *.
* inv H_atn. econstructor. eassumption. reflexivity.
* inv H_atn. econstructor. eapply IHx; eauto. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma atnd_defined Delta x : (exists B, atnd Delta x B) <-> x < length Delta.
Proof.
revert x. induction Delta; intuition; asimpl in *; ainv.
- destruct x. omega. cut(x < length Delta). omega.
ainv. firstorder.
- destruct x.
+ eexists. now econstructor.
+ edestruct IHDelta as [_ [? ?]]. cut(x < length Delta); eauto. omega.
eexists. econstructor; eauto.
Qed.
End SubstInstance.
(* Local Variables: *)
(* coq-load-path: (("." "Plain") ("../../theories" "Autosubst")) *)
(* End: *)