Require Import Equations.Equations.
Require Equations.Prop.EqDec.
From Undecidability.H10 Require Import H10 dio_single dio_logic.
From Undecidability.L.Datatypes Require Import LNat Lists LOptions LSum.
From Undecidability.L Require Import Tactics.LTactics Computability.MuRec Computability.Synthetic Tactics.GenEncode.
From Undecidability.Shared Require Import DLW.Utils.finite DLW.Vec.vec DLW.Vec.pos.
From Undecidability.MuRec Require Import recalg ra_bs ra_sem_eq.
Reserved Notation " '[' f ';' v ';' min ';' c ']' '~~>' x " (at level 70).
Inductive ra_bs_c : nat -> nat -> forall k, recalg k -> vec nat k -> nat -> Prop :=
| in_ra_bs_c_cst : forall min c n v, [ra_cst n; v; min; S c] ~~> n
| in_ra_bs_c_zero : forall min c v, [ra_zero; v; min; S c] ~~> 0
| in_ra_bs_c_succ : forall min c v, [ra_succ; v; min; S c] ~~> S (vec_head v)
| in_ra_bs_c_proj : forall min c k v j, [@ra_proj k j; v; min; S c] ~~> vec_pos v j
| in_ra_bs_c_comp : forall min c k i f (gj : vec (recalg i) k) v w x,
(forall j, [vec_pos gj j; v; min; c - pos2nat j] ~~> vec_pos w j)
-> [f; w; min; S c] ~~> x
-> [ra_comp f gj; v; min; S (S c)] ~~> x
| in_ra_bs_c_rec_0 : forall min c k f (g : recalg (S (S k))) v x,
[f; v; min; c] ~~> x
-> [ra_rec f g; 0##v; min; S c] ~~> x
| in_ra_bs_c_rec_S : forall min c k f (g : recalg (S (S k))) v n x y,
[ra_rec f g; n##v; min; c] ~~> x
-> [g; n##x##v; min; c] ~~> y
-> [ra_rec f g; S n##v; min; S c] ~~> y
| in_ra_bs_c_min : forall min c k (f : recalg (S k)) v x w , x >= min ->
(forall j : pos x, pos2nat j >= min -> [f; pos2nat j##v; 0; c - (pos2nat j - min)] ~~> S (vec_pos w j))
-> [f; x##v; 0; c - (x - min)] ~~> 0
-> [ra_min f; v; min; S c] ~~> x
where " [ f ; v ; min ; c ] ~~> x " := (@ra_bs_c min c _ f v x).
Lemma ra_bs_mono min k (f : recalg k) v c1 x :
[f ; v ; min ; c1 ] ~~> x -> forall c2, c1 <= c2 -> [f ; v ; min; c2] ~~> x.
Proof.
induction 1; intros; try (destruct c2;[ lia | ]).
- econstructor.
- econstructor.
- econstructor.
- econstructor.
- destruct c2; try lia. econstructor.
+ intros. eapply H0. lia.
+ eapply IHra_bs_c. lia.
- econstructor. eapply IHra_bs_c. lia.
- econstructor.
+ eapply IHra_bs_c1. lia.
+ eapply IHra_bs_c2. lia.
- econstructor.
+ lia.
+ intros. eapply H1. lia. lia.
+ eapply IHra_bs_c. lia.
Qed.
Lemma vec_sum_le:
forall (k : nat) (cst : vec nat k) (j : pos k), vec_pos cst j <= vec_sum cst.
Proof.
intros k cst j.
induction cst; cbn.
- invert pos j.
- invert pos j.
+ lia.
+ specialize (IHcst j); lia.
Qed.
Lemma ra_bs_from_c k (f : recalg k) c v x :
[f ; v ; 0 ; c] ~~> x -> [ f; v ] ~~> x.
Proof.
remember 0 as min.
induction 1; subst; eauto using ra_bs.
econstructor.
+ intros; eapply H1; lia.
+ auto.
Qed.
Lemma ra_bs_to_c k (f : recalg k) v x :
[ f; v ] ~~> x -> exists c, [f ; v ; 0 ; c] ~~> x.
Proof.
induction 1.
- exists 1. econstructor.
- exists 1. econstructor.
- exists 1. econstructor.
- exists 1. econstructor.
- destruct IHra_bs as [c].
eapply vec_reif in H0 as [cst].
exists (2 + c + vec_sum cst + k). cbn.
econstructor.
+ intros. eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto.
rewrite <- Nat.add_sub_assoc.
2: pose (pos2nat_prop j); lia.
enough (vec_pos cst j <= vec_sum cst).
lia. eapply vec_sum_le.
+ eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto. lia.
- destruct IHra_bs as [c]. exists (S c). now econstructor.
- destruct IHra_bs1 as [c1].
destruct IHra_bs2 as [c2].
exists (1 + c1 + c2).
cbn. econstructor.
+ eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto. lia.
+ eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto. lia.
- destruct IHra_bs as [c].
eapply vec_reif in H0 as [cst].
exists (1 + c + vec_sum cst + x). cbn.
econstructor. lia.
+ intros. eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto.
rewrite <- Nat.add_sub_assoc.
2: pose (pos2nat_prop j); lia.
enough (vec_pos cst j <= vec_sum cst) by lia.
eapply vec_sum_le.
+ eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto. lia.
Qed.
Local Hint Resolve ra_bs_from_c ra_bs_to_c : core.
Fact ra_bs_c_correct k (f : recalg k) v x :
[|f|] v x <-> exists c, [f ; v ; 0 ; c] ~~> x.
Proof.
rewrite ra_bs_correct; split; auto.
intros (c & H); revert H; apply ra_bs_from_c.
Qed.
Require Import Undecidability.L.Reductions.MuRec.MuRec_extract.
Definition rec_erase i (erase : forall i, recalg i -> reccode) := (fix rec k (v : vec (recalg i) k) := match v with vec_nil => rc_nil | x ## v => rc_cons (erase _ x) (rec _ v) end).
Fixpoint erase k (f : recalg k) : reccode :=
match f with
| ra_cst n => rc_cst n
| ra_zero => rc_zero
| ra_succ => rc_succ
| ra_proj _ p => rc_proj (pos2nat p)
| ra_comp _ _ f g => rc_comp (erase f) (rec_erase erase g)
| ra_rec _ f g => rc_rec (erase f) (erase g)
| ra_min _ f => rc_min (erase f)
end.
Lemma vec_list_nth:
forall (k : nat) (p : pos k) (v : vec nat k), nth_error (vec_list v) (pos2nat p) = Some (vec_pos v p).
Proof.
intros k p v.
induction v.
- invert pos p.
- cbn; invert pos p.
+ reflexivity.
+ eapply IHv.
Qed.
Lemma eval_inv n min i k (v : vec (recalg i) k) a l :
eval n min (rec_erase erase v) a = Some (inr l) ->
exists x, vec_list x = l /\
(forall j : pos k, eval (n -S (pos2nat j)) min (erase (vec_pos v j)) a = Some (inl (vec_pos x j))).
Proof.
induction v in n,l |- *.
- destruct n; cbn.
firstorder congruence.
exact vec_nil.
intros [=]; subst.
exists vec_nil.
split; auto.
intro j; invert pos j.
- destruct n. inversion 1.
intros ?. cbn in H.
destruct (eval n) eqn:E1; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence.
destruct (eval n min (rec_erase erase v) a) eqn:E2; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence. inv H.
edestruct IHv as (? & ? & ?). eauto.
exists (n1 ## x). split. cbn. firstorder congruence.
intros j; pos_inv j.
+ rewrite pos2nat_fst in *. assert (S n - 1 = n) by lia. rewrite H1 in *.
cbn -[eval]. eassumption.
+ rewrite pos2nat_nxt.
specialize (H0 j).
assert (S n - S (S (pos2nat j)) = n - S (pos2nat j)) by lia. rewrite H1 in *.
cbn. rewrite H0. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma le_ind2 m (P : nat -> Prop) :
P m -> (forall n, P (S n) -> S n <= m -> P n) -> forall n, n <= m -> P n.
Proof.
intros. induction H1.
- eauto.
- eauto.
Qed.
Lemma vec_pos_gt n X (w : vec X n) j k n1:
pos2nat k < pos2nat j ->
vec_pos w j = vec_pos (vec_change w k n1) j.
Proof.
intros.
induction w.
- invert pos j.
- invert pos j; cbn.
+ invert pos k; cbn; auto; lia.
+ invert pos k; cbn; auto.
apply IHw.
rewrite !pos2nat_nxt in H; lia.
Qed.
Lemma erase_correct k min (f : recalg k) v n c :
(ra_bs_c min c f v n <-> eval c min (erase f) (vec_list v) = Some (inl n)).
Proof.
revert all except c.
pattern c. eapply lt_wf_ind. intros.
destruct f; cbn.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H4. subst.
reflexivity.
+ destruct n; inversion 1. subst. econstructor.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H3. subst.
reflexivity.
+ destruct n; inversion 1. subst. econstructor.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H3. subst.
cbn; revert H0; vec split v with x; auto.
+ destruct n; inversion 1.
revert H0 H2; vec split v with x; cbn.
intros [=] _; subst; constructor.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H5. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H6. subst.
cbn. rewrite vec_list_nth. reflexivity.
+ destruct n; inversion 1. rewrite vec_list_nth in H2. inv H2. econstructor.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H2. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H7. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H7. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H8. subst.
assert (forall j : pos k, eval (c0 - pos2nat j) min (erase (vec_pos t j)) (vec_list v) = Some (inl (vec_pos w j))).
intros. eapply H. lia.
cbn. eapply H. lia. eapply H. lia. specialize (H9 j).
eapply H in H9. 2:lia. eapply H. lia. eauto.
remember (S c0) as c'. cbn.
assert (eval c' min (rec_erase erase t) (vec_list v) = Some (inr (vec_list w))).
{ subst. clear - H1. revert c0 H1. induction t; intros.
- cbn; vec nil w; reflexivity.
- cbn. pose proof (H1 pos_fst). cbn in H. rewrite pos2nat_fst in H.
replace (c0 - 0) with c0 in H by lia. rewrite H.
revert H1 H; vec split w with y; intros H1 H.
destruct c0. cbn in H. inv H. erewrite IHt.
reflexivity.
intros. specialize (H1 (pos_nxt j)). rewrite pos2nat_nxt in H1.
eassumption.
}
rewrite H2. subst. eapply H in H10. rewrite H10. reflexivity. lia.
+ destruct n; inversion 1.
destruct (eval n min (rec_erase erase t) (vec_list v)) eqn:E; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence.
destruct (eval n min (erase f) l) eqn:E2; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence. inv H2.
destruct n; try now inv E2.
destruct (list_vec_full l).
destruct (eval_inv E) as (w & ? & ?). subst.
eapply in_ra_bs_c_comp with (w := w).
* intros. eapply H. lia. specialize (H2 j). assert (S n - S (pos2nat j) = n - pos2nat j) by lia. rewrite H1 in *.
eauto.
* eapply H. lia. eassumption.
- split. inversion 1.
+ eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H4. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H6. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H7. subst.
cbn.
eapply H in H8. 2:lia. rewrite H8. reflexivity.
+ eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H2. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H5. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H6. subst.
eapply H in H7.
cbn. 2:lia. cbn in H7. rewrite H7.
eapply H in H9. 2:lia. cbn in H9. rewrite H9. reflexivity.
+ intros. destruct n; inv H0.
revert H2; vec split v with n1; cbn; intros H2.
destruct n1.
* destruct (eval n min (erase f1) (vec_list v)) eqn:E.
destruct s; inv H2.
-- econstructor. eapply H. lia. eauto.
-- econstructor. congruence.
* destruct eval eqn:E2; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence.
destruct (eval n min (erase f2)) eqn:E3.
destruct s; inv H2.
-- econstructor. eapply H. lia. eauto. eapply H. lia. eauto.
-- congruence.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H2. subst.
clear H0. unfold ge in *.
revert c0 H w H7 H8. pattern n0. revert min H3.
eapply le_ind2; intros.
* cbn in *. eapply H in H8. 2:lia.
assert (c0 - (n0 - n0) = c0) by lia. rewrite H0 in *.
cbn in H8. rewrite H8. reflexivity.
* destruct n0; try lia.
assert (n < S n0) by lia.
assert (H10 := H7).
specialize (H7 (nat2pos H2)). rewrite pos2nat_nat2pos in H7.
assert (n <= n) by lia. eapply H7 in H3.
eapply H1 in H3. 2: lia. cbn.
assert (c0 - (n - n) = c0) by lia. rewrite H4 in *. cbn in H3. rewrite H3.
assert (eval c0 (S n) (rc_min (erase f)) (vec_list v) = Some (inl (S n0))).
eapply H1 with (f := ra_min f). lia.
destruct c0. inv H3.
econstructor. lia.
intros ? ?. specialize (H10 j).
assert (S c0 - (pos2nat j - n) = c0 - (pos2nat j - S n)) by lia.
rewrite H6 in *. eapply H10. lia.
assert (S c0 - (S n0 - n) = c0 - (S n0 - S n)) by lia. rewrite H5 in *.
eassumption.
now rewrite H5.
+ intros.
destruct n; try now inv H0. cbn in H0.
destruct (eval n) eqn:E1; try now inv H0.
destruct s; try congruence.
destruct n1; inv H0.
* econstructor. lia. intros. pose proof (pos2nat_prop j). lia.
eapply H. lia. assert (n - (n0 - n0) = n) as -> by lia. eassumption.
* destruct (eval n (S min)) eqn:E2; try now inv H2.
destruct s; inv H2.
eapply H with (f := ra_min f) in E2. 2:lia.
eapply H with (v := vec_cons min v) in E1. 2:lia.
inversion E2; subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H0. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H1. subst.
assert (min < n0) by lia.
eapply in_ra_bs_c_min with (w := vec_change w (nat2pos H0) n1).
-- lia.
-- intros. inversion H1.
++ subst.
rewrite nat2pos_pos2nat.
rewrite vec_change_eq. 2:reflexivity.
assert (S c0 - (pos2nat j - pos2nat j) = S c0) as -> by lia.
eassumption.
++ specialize (H6 j).
assert (S c0 - (S m - min) = c0 - (pos2nat j - S min)) by lia. rewrite H5 in *.
enough (vec_pos w j = vec_pos (vec_change w (nat2pos H0) n1) j).
rewrite H8 in H6. rewrite H3. eapply H6. lia.
assert (pos2nat j > min) by lia.
eapply vec_pos_gt.
rewrite pos2nat_nat2pos. lia.
-- assert (S c0 - (n0 - min) = c0 - (n0 - S min)) by lia. rewrite H1. eassumption.
Grab Existential Variables. exact vec_zero.
Qed.
Require Import Undecidability.L.Reductions.MuRec.MuRec_extract.
Definition evalfun fuel c v := match eval fuel 0 c v with Some (inl x) => Some x | _ => None end.
Definition UMUREC_HALTING c := exists fuel, evalfun fuel c nil <> None.
Import Undecidability.Synthetic.Definitions Undecidability.Synthetic.ReducibilityFacts.
Lemma MUREC_red : MUREC_HALTING ⪯ UMUREC_HALTING.
Proof.
unshelve eexists.
- intros f. exact (erase f).
- unfold UMUREC_HALTING, MUREC_HALTING.
intros f.
split; intros [].
+ rewrite ra_bs_correct in H. eapply ra_bs_to_c in H as [].
exists x0. eapply erase_correct in H. unfold evalfun. cbn in H. rewrite H. congruence.
+ unfold evalfun in H. destruct eval eqn:E; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence.
eapply erase_correct with (v := vec_nil) in E.
exists n. eapply ra_bs_correct. now eapply ra_bs_from_c.
Qed.
Local Definition r := (fun c n => match eval n 0 c [] with Some (inl n) => true | _ => false end).
Lemma MUREC_WCBV : MUREC_HALTING ⪯ converges.
Proof.
eapply reduces_transitive. eapply MUREC_red.
eapply L_recognisable_halt.
exists (fun c n => match eval n 0 c [] with Some (inl n) => true | _ => false end).
split.
- econstructor. extract.
- firstorder.
+ unfold evalfun in *. exists x0. destruct eval; try destruct s; try congruence.
+ exists x0. unfold evalfun in *. destruct eval; try destruct s; try congruence.
Qed.
Require Equations.Prop.EqDec.
From Undecidability.H10 Require Import H10 dio_single dio_logic.
From Undecidability.L.Datatypes Require Import LNat Lists LOptions LSum.
From Undecidability.L Require Import Tactics.LTactics Computability.MuRec Computability.Synthetic Tactics.GenEncode.
From Undecidability.Shared Require Import DLW.Utils.finite DLW.Vec.vec DLW.Vec.pos.
From Undecidability.MuRec Require Import recalg ra_bs ra_sem_eq.
Reserved Notation " '[' f ';' v ';' min ';' c ']' '~~>' x " (at level 70).
Inductive ra_bs_c : nat -> nat -> forall k, recalg k -> vec nat k -> nat -> Prop :=
| in_ra_bs_c_cst : forall min c n v, [ra_cst n; v; min; S c] ~~> n
| in_ra_bs_c_zero : forall min c v, [ra_zero; v; min; S c] ~~> 0
| in_ra_bs_c_succ : forall min c v, [ra_succ; v; min; S c] ~~> S (vec_head v)
| in_ra_bs_c_proj : forall min c k v j, [@ra_proj k j; v; min; S c] ~~> vec_pos v j
| in_ra_bs_c_comp : forall min c k i f (gj : vec (recalg i) k) v w x,
(forall j, [vec_pos gj j; v; min; c - pos2nat j] ~~> vec_pos w j)
-> [f; w; min; S c] ~~> x
-> [ra_comp f gj; v; min; S (S c)] ~~> x
| in_ra_bs_c_rec_0 : forall min c k f (g : recalg (S (S k))) v x,
[f; v; min; c] ~~> x
-> [ra_rec f g; 0##v; min; S c] ~~> x
| in_ra_bs_c_rec_S : forall min c k f (g : recalg (S (S k))) v n x y,
[ra_rec f g; n##v; min; c] ~~> x
-> [g; n##x##v; min; c] ~~> y
-> [ra_rec f g; S n##v; min; S c] ~~> y
| in_ra_bs_c_min : forall min c k (f : recalg (S k)) v x w , x >= min ->
(forall j : pos x, pos2nat j >= min -> [f; pos2nat j##v; 0; c - (pos2nat j - min)] ~~> S (vec_pos w j))
-> [f; x##v; 0; c - (x - min)] ~~> 0
-> [ra_min f; v; min; S c] ~~> x
where " [ f ; v ; min ; c ] ~~> x " := (@ra_bs_c min c _ f v x).
Lemma ra_bs_mono min k (f : recalg k) v c1 x :
[f ; v ; min ; c1 ] ~~> x -> forall c2, c1 <= c2 -> [f ; v ; min; c2] ~~> x.
Proof.
induction 1; intros; try (destruct c2;[ lia | ]).
- econstructor.
- econstructor.
- econstructor.
- econstructor.
- destruct c2; try lia. econstructor.
+ intros. eapply H0. lia.
+ eapply IHra_bs_c. lia.
- econstructor. eapply IHra_bs_c. lia.
- econstructor.
+ eapply IHra_bs_c1. lia.
+ eapply IHra_bs_c2. lia.
- econstructor.
+ lia.
+ intros. eapply H1. lia. lia.
+ eapply IHra_bs_c. lia.
Qed.
Lemma vec_sum_le:
forall (k : nat) (cst : vec nat k) (j : pos k), vec_pos cst j <= vec_sum cst.
Proof.
intros k cst j.
induction cst; cbn.
- invert pos j.
- invert pos j.
+ lia.
+ specialize (IHcst j); lia.
Qed.
Lemma ra_bs_from_c k (f : recalg k) c v x :
[f ; v ; 0 ; c] ~~> x -> [ f; v ] ~~> x.
Proof.
remember 0 as min.
induction 1; subst; eauto using ra_bs.
econstructor.
+ intros; eapply H1; lia.
+ auto.
Qed.
Lemma ra_bs_to_c k (f : recalg k) v x :
[ f; v ] ~~> x -> exists c, [f ; v ; 0 ; c] ~~> x.
Proof.
induction 1.
- exists 1. econstructor.
- exists 1. econstructor.
- exists 1. econstructor.
- exists 1. econstructor.
- destruct IHra_bs as [c].
eapply vec_reif in H0 as [cst].
exists (2 + c + vec_sum cst + k). cbn.
econstructor.
+ intros. eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto.
rewrite <- Nat.add_sub_assoc.
2: pose (pos2nat_prop j); lia.
enough (vec_pos cst j <= vec_sum cst).
lia. eapply vec_sum_le.
+ eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto. lia.
- destruct IHra_bs as [c]. exists (S c). now econstructor.
- destruct IHra_bs1 as [c1].
destruct IHra_bs2 as [c2].
exists (1 + c1 + c2).
cbn. econstructor.
+ eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto. lia.
+ eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto. lia.
- destruct IHra_bs as [c].
eapply vec_reif in H0 as [cst].
exists (1 + c + vec_sum cst + x). cbn.
econstructor. lia.
+ intros. eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto.
rewrite <- Nat.add_sub_assoc.
2: pose (pos2nat_prop j); lia.
enough (vec_pos cst j <= vec_sum cst) by lia.
eapply vec_sum_le.
+ eapply ra_bs_mono. eauto. lia.
Qed.
Local Hint Resolve ra_bs_from_c ra_bs_to_c : core.
Fact ra_bs_c_correct k (f : recalg k) v x :
[|f|] v x <-> exists c, [f ; v ; 0 ; c] ~~> x.
Proof.
rewrite ra_bs_correct; split; auto.
intros (c & H); revert H; apply ra_bs_from_c.
Qed.
Require Import Undecidability.L.Reductions.MuRec.MuRec_extract.
Definition rec_erase i (erase : forall i, recalg i -> reccode) := (fix rec k (v : vec (recalg i) k) := match v with vec_nil => rc_nil | x ## v => rc_cons (erase _ x) (rec _ v) end).
Fixpoint erase k (f : recalg k) : reccode :=
match f with
| ra_cst n => rc_cst n
| ra_zero => rc_zero
| ra_succ => rc_succ
| ra_proj _ p => rc_proj (pos2nat p)
| ra_comp _ _ f g => rc_comp (erase f) (rec_erase erase g)
| ra_rec _ f g => rc_rec (erase f) (erase g)
| ra_min _ f => rc_min (erase f)
end.
Lemma vec_list_nth:
forall (k : nat) (p : pos k) (v : vec nat k), nth_error (vec_list v) (pos2nat p) = Some (vec_pos v p).
Proof.
intros k p v.
induction v.
- invert pos p.
- cbn; invert pos p.
+ reflexivity.
+ eapply IHv.
Qed.
Lemma eval_inv n min i k (v : vec (recalg i) k) a l :
eval n min (rec_erase erase v) a = Some (inr l) ->
exists x, vec_list x = l /\
(forall j : pos k, eval (n -S (pos2nat j)) min (erase (vec_pos v j)) a = Some (inl (vec_pos x j))).
Proof.
induction v in n,l |- *.
- destruct n; cbn.
firstorder congruence.
exact vec_nil.
intros [=]; subst.
exists vec_nil.
split; auto.
intro j; invert pos j.
- destruct n. inversion 1.
intros ?. cbn in H.
destruct (eval n) eqn:E1; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence.
destruct (eval n min (rec_erase erase v) a) eqn:E2; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence. inv H.
edestruct IHv as (? & ? & ?). eauto.
exists (n1 ## x). split. cbn. firstorder congruence.
intros j; pos_inv j.
+ rewrite pos2nat_fst in *. assert (S n - 1 = n) by lia. rewrite H1 in *.
cbn -[eval]. eassumption.
+ rewrite pos2nat_nxt.
specialize (H0 j).
assert (S n - S (S (pos2nat j)) = n - S (pos2nat j)) by lia. rewrite H1 in *.
cbn. rewrite H0. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma le_ind2 m (P : nat -> Prop) :
P m -> (forall n, P (S n) -> S n <= m -> P n) -> forall n, n <= m -> P n.
Proof.
intros. induction H1.
- eauto.
- eauto.
Qed.
Lemma vec_pos_gt n X (w : vec X n) j k n1:
pos2nat k < pos2nat j ->
vec_pos w j = vec_pos (vec_change w k n1) j.
Proof.
intros.
induction w.
- invert pos j.
- invert pos j; cbn.
+ invert pos k; cbn; auto; lia.
+ invert pos k; cbn; auto.
apply IHw.
rewrite !pos2nat_nxt in H; lia.
Qed.
Lemma erase_correct k min (f : recalg k) v n c :
(ra_bs_c min c f v n <-> eval c min (erase f) (vec_list v) = Some (inl n)).
Proof.
revert all except c.
pattern c. eapply lt_wf_ind. intros.
destruct f; cbn.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H4. subst.
reflexivity.
+ destruct n; inversion 1. subst. econstructor.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H3. subst.
reflexivity.
+ destruct n; inversion 1. subst. econstructor.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H3. subst.
cbn; revert H0; vec split v with x; auto.
+ destruct n; inversion 1.
revert H0 H2; vec split v with x; cbn.
intros [=] _; subst; constructor.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H5. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H6. subst.
cbn. rewrite vec_list_nth. reflexivity.
+ destruct n; inversion 1. rewrite vec_list_nth in H2. inv H2. econstructor.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H2. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H7. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H7. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H8. subst.
assert (forall j : pos k, eval (c0 - pos2nat j) min (erase (vec_pos t j)) (vec_list v) = Some (inl (vec_pos w j))).
intros. eapply H. lia.
cbn. eapply H. lia. eapply H. lia. specialize (H9 j).
eapply H in H9. 2:lia. eapply H. lia. eauto.
remember (S c0) as c'. cbn.
assert (eval c' min (rec_erase erase t) (vec_list v) = Some (inr (vec_list w))).
{ subst. clear - H1. revert c0 H1. induction t; intros.
- cbn; vec nil w; reflexivity.
- cbn. pose proof (H1 pos_fst). cbn in H. rewrite pos2nat_fst in H.
replace (c0 - 0) with c0 in H by lia. rewrite H.
revert H1 H; vec split w with y; intros H1 H.
destruct c0. cbn in H. inv H. erewrite IHt.
reflexivity.
intros. specialize (H1 (pos_nxt j)). rewrite pos2nat_nxt in H1.
eassumption.
}
rewrite H2. subst. eapply H in H10. rewrite H10. reflexivity. lia.
+ destruct n; inversion 1.
destruct (eval n min (rec_erase erase t) (vec_list v)) eqn:E; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence.
destruct (eval n min (erase f) l) eqn:E2; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence. inv H2.
destruct n; try now inv E2.
destruct (list_vec_full l).
destruct (eval_inv E) as (w & ? & ?). subst.
eapply in_ra_bs_c_comp with (w := w).
* intros. eapply H. lia. specialize (H2 j). assert (S n - S (pos2nat j) = n - pos2nat j) by lia. rewrite H1 in *.
eauto.
* eapply H. lia. eassumption.
- split. inversion 1.
+ eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H4. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H6. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H7. subst.
cbn.
eapply H in H8. 2:lia. rewrite H8. reflexivity.
+ eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H2. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H5. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H6. subst.
eapply H in H7.
cbn. 2:lia. cbn in H7. rewrite H7.
eapply H in H9. 2:lia. cbn in H9. rewrite H9. reflexivity.
+ intros. destruct n; inv H0.
revert H2; vec split v with n1; cbn; intros H2.
destruct n1.
* destruct (eval n min (erase f1) (vec_list v)) eqn:E.
destruct s; inv H2.
-- econstructor. eapply H. lia. eauto.
-- econstructor. congruence.
* destruct eval eqn:E2; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence.
destruct (eval n min (erase f2)) eqn:E3.
destruct s; inv H2.
-- econstructor. eapply H. lia. eauto. eapply H. lia. eauto.
-- congruence.
- split.
+ inversion 1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H1. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H2. subst.
clear H0. unfold ge in *.
revert c0 H w H7 H8. pattern n0. revert min H3.
eapply le_ind2; intros.
* cbn in *. eapply H in H8. 2:lia.
assert (c0 - (n0 - n0) = c0) by lia. rewrite H0 in *.
cbn in H8. rewrite H8. reflexivity.
* destruct n0; try lia.
assert (n < S n0) by lia.
assert (H10 := H7).
specialize (H7 (nat2pos H2)). rewrite pos2nat_nat2pos in H7.
assert (n <= n) by lia. eapply H7 in H3.
eapply H1 in H3. 2: lia. cbn.
assert (c0 - (n - n) = c0) by lia. rewrite H4 in *. cbn in H3. rewrite H3.
assert (eval c0 (S n) (rc_min (erase f)) (vec_list v) = Some (inl (S n0))).
eapply H1 with (f := ra_min f). lia.
destruct c0. inv H3.
econstructor. lia.
intros ? ?. specialize (H10 j).
assert (S c0 - (pos2nat j - n) = c0 - (pos2nat j - S n)) by lia.
rewrite H6 in *. eapply H10. lia.
assert (S c0 - (S n0 - n) = c0 - (S n0 - S n)) by lia. rewrite H5 in *.
eassumption.
now rewrite H5.
+ intros.
destruct n; try now inv H0. cbn in H0.
destruct (eval n) eqn:E1; try now inv H0.
destruct s; try congruence.
destruct n1; inv H0.
* econstructor. lia. intros. pose proof (pos2nat_prop j). lia.
eapply H. lia. assert (n - (n0 - n0) = n) as -> by lia. eassumption.
* destruct (eval n (S min)) eqn:E2; try now inv H2.
destruct s; inv H2.
eapply H with (f := ra_min f) in E2. 2:lia.
eapply H with (v := vec_cons min v) in E1. 2:lia.
inversion E2; subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H0. subst.
eapply (Eqdep_dec.inj_pair2_eq_dec _ nat_eq_dec) in H1. subst.
assert (min < n0) by lia.
eapply in_ra_bs_c_min with (w := vec_change w (nat2pos H0) n1).
-- lia.
-- intros. inversion H1.
++ subst.
rewrite nat2pos_pos2nat.
rewrite vec_change_eq. 2:reflexivity.
assert (S c0 - (pos2nat j - pos2nat j) = S c0) as -> by lia.
eassumption.
++ specialize (H6 j).
assert (S c0 - (S m - min) = c0 - (pos2nat j - S min)) by lia. rewrite H5 in *.
enough (vec_pos w j = vec_pos (vec_change w (nat2pos H0) n1) j).
rewrite H8 in H6. rewrite H3. eapply H6. lia.
assert (pos2nat j > min) by lia.
eapply vec_pos_gt.
rewrite pos2nat_nat2pos. lia.
-- assert (S c0 - (n0 - min) = c0 - (n0 - S min)) by lia. rewrite H1. eassumption.
Grab Existential Variables. exact vec_zero.
Qed.
Require Import Undecidability.L.Reductions.MuRec.MuRec_extract.
Definition evalfun fuel c v := match eval fuel 0 c v with Some (inl x) => Some x | _ => None end.
Definition UMUREC_HALTING c := exists fuel, evalfun fuel c nil <> None.
Import Undecidability.Synthetic.Definitions Undecidability.Synthetic.ReducibilityFacts.
Lemma MUREC_red : MUREC_HALTING ⪯ UMUREC_HALTING.
Proof.
unshelve eexists.
- intros f. exact (erase f).
- unfold UMUREC_HALTING, MUREC_HALTING.
intros f.
split; intros [].
+ rewrite ra_bs_correct in H. eapply ra_bs_to_c in H as [].
exists x0. eapply erase_correct in H. unfold evalfun. cbn in H. rewrite H. congruence.
+ unfold evalfun in H. destruct eval eqn:E; try congruence.
destruct s; try congruence.
eapply erase_correct with (v := vec_nil) in E.
exists n. eapply ra_bs_correct. now eapply ra_bs_from_c.
Qed.
Local Definition r := (fun c n => match eval n 0 c [] with Some (inl n) => true | _ => false end).
Lemma MUREC_WCBV : MUREC_HALTING ⪯ converges.
Proof.
eapply reduces_transitive. eapply MUREC_red.
eapply L_recognisable_halt.
exists (fun c n => match eval n 0 c [] with Some (inl n) => true | _ => false end).
split.
- econstructor. extract.
- firstorder.
+ unfold evalfun in *. exists x0. destruct eval; try destruct s; try congruence.
+ exists x0. unfold evalfun in *. destruct eval; try destruct s; try congruence.
Qed.